Yet another blog post commenting on the WSJ debacle about non-climate scientists' opinions versus climate scientists' opinions
got me thinking (again) why the conversation about climate change is so
charged. There are always conflicting opinions on many issues,
especially those that have the potential to affect our way of living.
But when a vast majority of specialists around the world agree on
something, I would argue that they probably have a basis for that.
Freedom of speech is an important part of the democratic process, but it
should be used to bridge paths and not divide them. Having strong
opinions about something is certainly warranted, and debate is welcome.
However, it seems that when it comes to climate change, some
not-so-civil behavior has become acceptable.
Just in the past couple of weeks, various articles have decried the
personal attacks climate scientists have been receiving, simply because
they do science that some people do not agree with or choose not to
believe in. These articles (examples here, here, and here)
describe (some in detail) what types of threatening emails and other
acts climate scientists are being subjected to. Emails saying "I know
where your kids go to school" and "you are nothing but a liar" are
disrespectful at best and harassment at worst, which is unacceptable in
any context. Why do some people feel the need to resort to personal
attacks about climate?
A lot of misunderstandings about climate science stems from the
scientific method itself. Science is almost never certain -- it mostly
deals with probable causes and certain relationships, some stronger than
others. In the case of climate, there is a rather large amount of
uncertainty related to the actual warming we will see, since it largely
depends on what people do in the coming years, but there is no
uncertainty that it is getting warmer. This post
gives a good analogy of climate science, in that it is not a house of
cards that if one card (or fact) falls, the whole thing collapses.
Rather, it is more like a jigsaw puzzle, where some pieces may be
missing, and some may be in the wrong place, but one can still see the
big picture. Why is it then, that so many people cannot see the jigsaw
picture?
No comments:
Post a Comment