Showing posts with label Tar Sands. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tar Sands. Show all posts

Monday, July 16, 2012

In Canada's Tar Sands, a Dante's Hell Threatens People Nearby and Across the Globe


In Canada's western province of Alberta, Melina Laboucan-Massimo’s community—the Lubicon Lake Nation—has endured a withering toxic tar sands oil assault, an Armageddon against nature few Americans are fully aware of. Here in the once pristine sub-Arctic, tar sands mining operations level vast swaths of boreal forests near native lands, as pipelines burst and spew corrosive chemical-laced tar sands oil into rivers and lakes.
The Lubicon are used to living in harmony with nature. But tar sands mining has brought a deadly discordance to their environment. Melina has watched family and friends battle unheard of cancers and respiratory ailments; she's listened to local fishermen and hunters complain about unusual lesions and tumors festering in their catches and prey. She's reacted in disbelief as her government has sponsored airborne sharpshooters to gun down mighty Canadian wolf packs—a zero sum game that is killing one species to try to save another—as dwindling herds of caribou flee their disappearing forest homes and may be gone  forever in the not so distant future.
For members of the Lubicon Lake Nation, it is a nightmare of Kafkaesque proportions. Their verdant land of abundant wildlife is metastasizing into pock-marketed battlefields of a thousand Verduns. Melina and other community leaders have not sat idly by as the environmental carnage unfolds around them. She has testified before Congress, spearheaded Greenpeace protest actions, and worked tirelessly to get the word out about the devastation in her community.
Watch Melina Laboucan-Massimo's story about the destruction of her native land in this short video, soon to be posted along with other updates to the Voices Against Tar Sands webpage. 
According to one report, at least seven million gallons of oil has been spilled in Alberta since 2006—much of it tar sands oil—and there have been thousands of pipeline accidents since the 1990s. 
Just in the past few months there have been several major pipeline spills in the province, including one spilled millions of gallons of crude near Melina’s community a little over a year ago. This is how Melina describes it when she along with others impacted by one of the largest tar sands spills in historyduring a rare opportunity to testify before Congress last March:
Last spring I returned home to where I was born to witness the aftermath of one of the largest oil spills in Alberta’s history. What I saw was a landscape forever changed by oil that had consumed a vast stretch of the traditional territory where my family had once hunted, trapped and picked berries and medicines for generations. Days before the federal or provincial government admitted that this had happened my family was sending me text messages telling me of headaches, burning eyes, nausea and dizziness asking me if I could find out more information as to if it was an oil spill and how big it might be…. It wasn’t until the day after the federal election that the information was released of the magnitude of the spill – 28, 000 barrels or 4.5 million litres of oil had soaked the land – this is 50 per cent larger than the tar sands oil spill in the Kalamazoo River in Michigan the year before. Soon afterward the story was swept under the carpet away from the eyes of the public yet it took until the end of the year for the official clean up to be done, but just like in Michigan we know that the land and water in that area will never be the same.
The poisons that infest these tar sands mining operations are some of the nastiest in the petrochemical world, including highly dangerous compounds like mercury, arsenic and lead. As they are dumped into rivers that flow toward the Arctic and are spewed into the cold north winds that deposit them far and wide across the remote region—thanks to powerful wind and water currents that already make it a natural sink for global toxic emissions.
seminal study published in the National Academy of Sciences in 2010, led by renowned Alberta biologist David Schindler, found toxic pollutants from tar sands oil operations leaching into the Athabasca River, which flows north and feeds into the vast MacKenzie River Basin system that empties into the Arctic Ocean. The study poked holes in the Canadian government’s environmental monitoring system—long decried as inadequate and industry-biased by environmentalists and health activists—forcing the government to implement a new environmental monitoring plan this year.

Tar sands mining operations in Alberta.  Photos: David Dodge/The Pembina Institute
But it’s not just the river of poisons being unleashed into the environment that concerns scientists. Huge areas of boreal forests are being transformed into open-pit mining operations, decimating critical carbon-storing forests and habitat and adding massive amounts of greenhouse gas emissions to the world’s increasingly polluted skies. Those losses are not being recovered and factored into the overall environmental impacts of tar sands mining, according to a paper Schindler and others published last year: 
Claims by industry that they will “return the land we use – including reclaiming tailings ponds - to a sustainable landscape that is equal to or better than how we found it” (33) and that it “will be replanted with the same trees and plants and formed into habitat for the same species” (34) are clearly greenwashing.
The postmining landscape will support >65% less peatland. One consequence of this transformation is a dramatic loss of carbon storage and sequestration potential, the cost of which has not been factored into land-use decisions. To fairly evaluate the costs and benefits of oil sands mining in Alberta, impacts on natural capital and ecosystem services must be rigorously assessed.
For people like the Lubicon, it’s been a frustrating exercise, a battle against Big Oil and powerful political interests bent on maximizing profits . Already, the province of Alberta has the highest per capita green house emissions compared to any country in the world, and emissions from tar sands are estimated to be four times as energy-intensive as conventional oil production in the U.S. and Canada. That has permanently altered not only the landscape but the livelihoods of a people who for centuries lived in harmony with the land, a land that now is being altered from a bountiful paradise into Dante's Hell. This is how Melina described it to Congress:
As we see the landscape change, my father who is a Cree hunter has more and more difficulty in finding moose to feed our family and community. A couple of years ago, he found 3 tumours in the carcass of a moose while hunting in our traditional territory. Pristine forest, wetlands, bogs and fens are torn up and destroyed which will be replaced by acidic soil, end cap lakes and tree farms – a mere shadow of what once was. Currently we have toxic tailing ponds sitting on the land in northern Alberta that span over 170 square kilometers which is equivalent to 42,000 acres – this is not including the toxic waste that is produced by In Situ projects which are either injected back into the earth or taken away to sit in landfills. These tailing ponds contain a whole slew of toxic chemicals from arsenic, cyanide, mercury, lead, benzene, ammonia, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and naphthenic acids some of which are known carcinogens. These tailing ponds are leeching into the Athabasca watershed. It has been estimated that every day over 11 million litres or almost 3 million gallons leeched into the watershed.
Stories like Melina's are heart-breaking, but they remain a hard sell to politicians who benefit from the profit-driven largess of Big Oil’s billions—profits that may doom the people and wildlife inhabiting an area the size of Florida to a poisonous demise. Already Alberta has the highest per capita green house emissions compared to emissions in any country in the world, and tar sands mining operations are estimated to be about four times as energy intensive as conventional oil production in the U.S. and Canada.
James Hansen, the director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, has famously said, it’s “game over” for the planet if the 170 billion barrels of tar sands oil estimated to be stored in Canada is developed and processed. His op-ed this year of the potential impacts reads like something out of a Stephen King novel: 
Canada’s tar sands, deposits of sand saturated with bitumen, contain twice the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by global oil use in our entire history. If we were to fully exploit this new oil source, and continue to burn our conventional oil, gas and coal supplies, concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere eventually would reach levels higher than in the Pliocene era, more than 2.5 million years ago, when sea level was at least 50 feet higher than it is now. That level of heat-trapping gases would assure that the disintegration of the ice sheets would accelerate out of control. Sea levels would rise and destroy coastal cities. Global temperatures would become intolerable. Twenty to 50 percent of the planet’s species would be driven to extinction. Civilization would be at risk.
The bottom line is we are all at risk if tar sands mining operations poisoning First Nation lands in Canada continue to be developed unabated. As Melina has testified before Congress, it's more than a matter of life and death. “What kind of air, what kind of water will we be left with, so it’s a scary scenario to think about how much worse it could get,” she pleaded with members of the most powerful government on earth.
Unfortunately it likely will get worse, much worse. The Keystone pipeline—and a host of other tar sands pipelines on the drawing boards—are poised to bring rivers of poisonous bitumen crude to the U.S., where it's likely most of it will be refined and shipped to international consumers. The heat and violent storms plaguing the U.S. and the world will only get more deadly as mammoth deposits of dirty tar sands oil are processed, refined and burned to support the world’s ever-growing oil addiction.
Meanwhile, if nothing is done to rapidly transform our energy needs to more sustainable, renewable energy sources, the caribou, wolves and birds of the Alberta boreal forests will disappear into the Arctic night, never to return. It will be a sad ending to the environment and traditions the Lubicon people are fighting to protect, traditions that in the end will protect us all. 

By Rocky Kistner@theenergycollective.com


Friday, June 29, 2012

Real People, Real Stories About How Tar Sands Affects Us


Big Oil is pushing a web of pipelines from strip-mining of Canada's dirty and costly tar sands from under the Boreal forest. But people on the front lines are speaking out, taking a stand against dirty energy. We've captured their stories here to show how Keystone XL and other tar sands pipelines, as well as tar sands extraction and refining will have real impacts, on real people. Scroll your mouse over a starred section of the map and click on a point to bring up a particular story from the front lines.

Our Work

NRDC works with a coalition of partners in an effort to clean up existing tar sands operations, stop tar sands expansion and stop new proposed tar sands pipelines such as the Keystone XL project from Canada to Texas. This is part of a bigger effort to reduce our dependence on oil and move to cleaner forms of energy.

Voices Against Tar Sands from a Nebraska Landowner

Randy Thompson is a landowner from Nebraska who is fighting TransCanada's attempt to cross his land with the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline. Randy says, "We didn't think a foreign corporation could actually have the power to come and take our land away from us. We're an agricultural state. If we don't have water, we're out of business." Watch for more on Randy's story.




Voices Against Tar Sands from a Texas Landowner and Welder

Mike Hathorn is a welder and Texas landowner who opposes the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, which would run directly through his land. After three years of negotiations against the pipeline, Mike was forced to settle because it was costing him too much in legal fees, saying "Big oil, big money. That's what we were up against." Watch for more on Mike's story.




Voices Against Tar Sands from a Business-owner in the Michigan Tar Sands Oil Spill Area

The tar sands oil spill near Marshall, Michigan closed down the business of Debra Miller and her husband for several months. Deb says, "That pipeline break put a million gallons into our river, changed our communities forever. What is that doing to our tax base and our public safety?" Watch for more on Deb's story.


National Resources Defense Council 

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Transportation Bill: Keystone XL Pipeline Out, Senior Aide Says


A Republican proposal forcing quick approval of the Canada-to-U.S. Keystone oil pipeline will not be part of a massive transportation funding bill the U.S. Congress is trying to pass by week's end, a senior Democratic aide said on Wednesday.

"Keystone is out," said the aide, who asked not to be identified. The aide added that while House-Senate negotiators are close to an overall deal on the transportation bill, they have not yet wrapped it up.

The House of Representatives and the Senate aim to pass the bill by Friday to fund road, bridge and mass transit funding projects.

If a deal falls through, lawmakers were expected to pass a short-term extension for current transportation funding levels.

"A lot of work that's gone into this, it's not finished yet. But it is clear that there are significant reforms in this bill," House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner told reporters earlier on Wednesday.

The package is also expected to include a one-year, $6 billion fix to prevent a doubling of interest rates for about 7.4 million students with Stafford loans to help pay their college costs.

"I'm cautiously optimistic that we can end this week tomorrow even, with a little bit of luck - but we may not be able to," said Harry Reid, the Senate Democratic leader.

"We have to see what happens in the next 24 hours, which will be key," Reid said.


KEYSTONE WAS MAJOR HURDLE

The subject of TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline was one of the thorniest issues before negotiators during weeks of talks - but was one of the very last topics to be tackled.

President Barack Obama ruled earlier this year that more environmental reviews were needed for all but the southernmost tip of the 1,700-mile-long (2,736 km) pipeline, which would carry crude from Canada's oilsands to Texas.

The White House has said Obama would veto a bill that overrides his decision.

Republicans have championed the pipeline's cause ahead of the November presidential and congressional elections, arguing that it would create much-needed construction jobs and panning Obama for stalling it.

The Keystone measure has passed in the House four times, but narrowly failed a Senate vote in March.

Republicans pushed hard for other concessions in the transportation funding bill, which is based on a two-year, $109 billion package passed by the Senate.

Boehner told reporters the deal would include "significant reforms" to streamline environmental reviews for certain highway projects, and reduce the number of programs in the highway bill, focusing spending on core transportation projects rather than directing money toward roadside landscaping and other ancillary programs.

The deal will include provisions to ensure that 80 percent of fines imposed on BP after the Gulf of Mexico oil spill will go to Gulf coast communities, Democratic Senator Bill Nelson of Florida, who was on the negotiating panel, said in a tweet.

There was also a last-minute push to include a compromise to ease proposed Environmental Protection Agency regulations for coal ash, a byproduct used in cement, an industry source said.





U.S. Grants a Keystone Pipeline Permit

 

President Obama pledging to green-light a southern leg of the Keystone XL pipeline at a pipeyard near Cushing, Okla., in March
The Obama administration, moving swiftly on the president’s promise to expedite the southernmost portion of the disputed Keystone XL pipeline, has granted construction permits for part of the route passing through Texas, officials said on Tuesday.

The Army Corps of Engineers on Monday told TransCanada, which wants to build a 1,700-mile pipeline to carry heavy crude from Alberta to the Gulf Coast, that it could begin construction on the portion of the proposed pipeline that would end at the gulf port of Nederland, Tex. The Corps of Engineers is still reviewing permits for a section of the pipeline beginning at a major oil depot in Cushing, Okla., and linking up with the final leg ending at the gulf.

In January, President Obama denied TransCanada permission to build the northern part of the pipeline from Canada to Oklahoma, saying Congress had not given him sufficient time to review the environmental impact. But at a political appearance in March in Oklahoma, he announced he was taking steps to speed approval of the portion of the project running from Cushing to the gulf to relieve a bottleneck in oil supplies at the Oklahoma oil terminal.

The president also invited the company to resubmit its application for the rest of the pipeline. The company did so in early May.

2:14 p.m. | Updated TransCanada said Tuesday that it welcomed the permits and was awaiting approvals from the two other Corps of Engineers districts that must rule on the remaining 400 miles of pipeline route beginning in Cushing.

“We continue to believe that we will be in a position to begin construction later this summer and are working with the Corps and others to secure the approvals and permits we require,” the company said in a statement. “Once the gulf coast project is completed, it will help move both Canadian and American oil to refineries on the gulf coast, where it is critically needed.”
It will help push out oil from OPEC nations or conflict regions and replace it with safe, secure and reliable access to Canadian and American oil,” it added. “It will help remove the bottleneck that currently exists in Cushing, which is impacting American producers.”

Environmental advocates and some local landowner groups strongly opposed the pipeline, citing the dangers of possible spills and saying that the oil it would carry, extracted from tar sands formations in northern Canada, was a major contributor to greenhouse gas pollution.


More than 10,000 protesters surrounded the White House on Sunday calling on President Obama to reject the proposed Keystone XL tar sands oil pipeline from Canada to the Gulf Coast. The protest came exactly a year before the 2012 election and the pipeline is shaping up to be a major political issue. Last week, President Obama said for the first time he will make the final decision on whether to approve the controversial 1,700-mile pipeline proposed by TransCanada, which would transport oil from the Alberta tar sands fields to refineries in Texas. Up until now, Obama said the final decision rested with the State Department. "[Sunday protest] really underlines this has become not only the biggest environmental flash point in many years, but maybe the issue in recent times in the Obama administration when he has been most directly confronted by people in the street," said leading environmentalist Bill McKibben, a key organizer in the protest, to Democracy Now! Nov. 7.

For the complete interview, read the transcript, download the podcast, and for information on Democracy Now! and more reports on the Keystone XL pipeline, visit http://www.democracynow.org/

Election year politics confusing a vital American decision. These are my sentiments:

Thursday, June 21, 2012

Officials Investigate Another Alberta Pipeline Leak

A boom stretches out to contain a pipeline leak on the Gleniffer reservoir near Innisfail, Alta., Tuesday, June 12, 2012. Enbridge Inc. announced on June 18 that another oil spill had occurred near Elk Lake, northeast of Edmonton.(Jeff McIntosh / THE CANADIAN PRESS)


Alberta officials are investigating after yet another pipeline leaked in the province, causing crude oil to spill at a pumping station near Elk Lake, northeast of Edmonton.

The spill at Enbridge Inc.'s Athabasca pipeline happened Monday. An estimated 230,000 litres of heavy crude oil leaked, according to the company.

However, Darin Barter of the province's Energy Resources Conservation Board (ERCB) said the amount of oil spilled, and the cause, have not yet been confirmed.

"It's too early to really tell what the cause will be because we are in frankly a messy situation with oil and at this point the priority is to get it off the ground," Barter told CTV Edmonton in an interview.

Enbridge confirmed Tuesday the leak occurred at the pumping station about 24 kilometres southeast of Elk Point, Alberta.

In a release, the oil company said the pipeline had been shut down and the pumping station had been isolated.

"No waterways are impacted and cleanup is underway," the statement said.
There were no injuries or evacuations as a result of the oil leak. The ERCB is continuing to investigate the leak.

Earlier this month the oil company Plains Midstream Canada announced that 475,000 litres of oil had spilled into Alberta's Red Deer River and a water reservoir downstream of the leak.

And in May, Calgary-based Pace Oil and Gas announced a spill after it was spotted during a flyover in a remote muskeg area of northwestern Alberta, about 20 kilometres southeast of Rainbow Lake.

The spill affected an area about 500 metres long by 200 metres wide, said Fred Woods, president and CEO of Pace Oil and Gas Ltd.

CTV News



This post documents 2 leaks in Canadian pipelines. It is these companies that want to build a pipeline from the Canadian border, through the midwest, to refineries near the gulf. Lets hope the president continues to block this construction. This is the "dirtiest" oil on the planet and we certainly don't need another catastrophic oil spill. 

Saturday, June 16, 2012

Tar Sands Pipelines: the Dirtiest Oil on Earth


The Sierra Club Beyond Oil Campaign will block the most dangerous oil projects (Keystone XL, Enbridge Gateway, Trailbreaker pipelines) and revoke the oil industry's license to operate above the law and interfere with our transition to a clean energy future. Narrated by Joshua Jackson

Monday, June 11, 2012

Garth Lenz: The True Cost of Oil


What does environmental devastation actually look like? At TEDxVictoria, photographer Garth Lenz shares shocking photos of the Alberta Tar Sands mining project -- and the beautiful (and vital) ecosystems under threat.

TED.com 

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

The Tar Sands Pipeline Boom

As debate over the future of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline continues to boil in Congress and on the presidential campaign trail, energy companies are proceeding with many other pipeline projects that would give large amounts of Canadian crude access to foreign markets within the next five years.

InsideClimate News compiled a map and list showing industry's planned expansion. We discovered that there are more than 10,000 miles of pipelines planned to send an additional 3.1 million barrels a day of Alberta's oil to export markets, at a cost to build of almost $40 billion.



A breakdown of recently completed and proposed projects:
Keystone Phase I
Company building it: TransCanada
Project date: Online June 2010
Origin and destination: Hardisty, Alberta to Steele City, Neb., and on to Wood River, Ill. and Patoka, Ill.
Length: 2,147 miles
Capacity: Initial capacity is 435,000 barrels per day, with the capability of increasing to 591,000 barrels per day
Cost: Approximately $4.6 billion
Project status: Operational since June 2010

Keystone Cushing Extension (Keystone Phase II)
Company building it: TransCanada
Project date: Online February 2011
Origin and destination: Steele City, Neb. to the Midwest oil hub in Cushing, Okla.
Length: 298 miles
Capacity: Keystone Phase I plus the Keystone Cushing Extension can deliver up to 591,000 barrels per day
Cost: Approximately $1.6 billion
Project Status: Operational since February 2011

Keystone XL Pipeline Project
Company building it: TransCanada
Project date: Originally proposed in 2008. TransCanada is expected to file a new presidential permit application with the U.S. State Department in May 2012. A federal review is required because it crosses an international border.
Origin and destination: Hardisty, Alberta to Steele City, Neb.
Length: 1,179 miles
Capacity: Capacity of 830,000 barrels per day
Cost: Approximately $5 billion
Project status: TransCanada expects a start date of sometime in 2015.

The Gulf Coast Pipeline Project
Company building it: TransCanada
Project date: Originally proposed as the southern portion of the Keystone XL system in 2008. In February 2012, TransCanada announced that it would proceed with the south leg first to skirt a federal review of the entire project. Because it does not cross an international border, the southern part would not require approval of the State Department.
Origin and destination: Cushing, Okla. and extending south to Nederland, Texas to serve Gulf Coast refineries
Length: 485 miles
Capacity: Initial capacity of 700,000 barrels of oil per day, which could be expanded to 830,000 barrels of oil per day
Cost:  Approximately $2.3 billion
Project status: TransCanada expects construction to begin in mid-2012, with an anticipated start date of mid-to-late 2013.

Houston Lateral Project
Company building it: TransCanada
Project date: Originally proposed as part of the Keystone XL system in 2008.