With support from a $6 million grant from the PepsiCo Foundation, the
Columbia Water Center has been analyzing the problem of water resource
deficits across India. The rapidly declining groundwater table in
Punjab–one of the most agriculturally productive states and the heart of
green revolution belt in northern India–is especially disturbing.
As the epicenter of the Green Revolution of the 1960s and 70s,
Punjab’s agricultural fecundity earned the state a reputation as the
breadbasket of India. While aggregate production of staple crops nearly
doubled with the introduction of innovative agricultural methods, the
cost in terms of ecological damage–further aggravated by the impact of
climate change on weather patterns–is an outcome we are just beginning
to scratch the surface of.
The semi-arid state of Punjab accounts for less than 2 percent of the
India’s total geographic area but contributes more than a staggering 50
percent of the country’s annual national food grain reserves. While
extensive irrigation networks help to buffer seasonal rainfall
variations, widespread rural electrification in the state has led to
extensive groundwater based irrigation. Coupled with a flat-fee
electricity subsidy that has led to a dramatic increase in the number of
wells, groundwater-based irrigation now far surpasses surface water
use.
We estimate that the state is overdrawing its groundwater resources
by a shockingly unsustainable 45 percent over that replenished by
rainfall every year. Farmers who used to pump from 5 to 10 feet below
the surface are now drilling to depths of 200 to 300 feet. As a result,
the groundwater table is falling at approximately a rate of 1 meter per
year, as opposed to just 18 cm per year during the mid-1980s. This
disturbing and remarkable increase in water usage has come about from a
number of changes in the agricultural economy of Punjab, including a
dramatic increase in cropping intensity from the 1960s until now.
Satellite image showing the groundwater crisis in Punjab, India. Blue indicates areas with water surplus, yellow shows the beginning of a deficit. Red areas show regions experiencing severe groundwater depletion. Source: NASA.
In addition, the state has gone from growing a previously healthy mix
of crops such as wheat, maize, pulses and vegetables to devoting nearly
80 percent of its crop area to rice and wheat, two of the most
water-intensive crops. While the government did initiate policies to
promote crop diversification in 1985, these attempts largely failed
because of assured government prices offered for wheat and rice.
Overall, central and state level agriculture policy–consisting of
minimum support prices, effective procurement of selected crops, input
subsidies benefiting farmers in electricity, fertilizer, and irrigation
and the increased availability of credit facilities over the years–has
played a key role in pushing farmers to grow primarily wheat and rice–at
enormous detriment to water resource sustainability in the country.
Furthermore, while the promotion of rice and wheat cropping once held
the promise of ever-increasing agricultural productivity, scientists no
longer predict the large growth in yield from agricultural innovation
that was common in the 1960s and 1970s.
Agroeconomists point the finger at diminishing marginal returns–the
economic principal that a production system with an ever-increasing
input will soon start to yield smaller and smaller increases in output
as the system hits a saturation point. According to a 2007 State of the
Environment Report, in the last five years, the production of food
grains in Punjab has increased by only 2 percent whereas the population
has risen by nearly 8.6 percent. As a result, the contribution of the
agricultural sector to the state GDP has declined from just over 46
percent to 37 percent.
The combination of declining farm yields and incomes due to economic
and ecological factors (low soil productivity, receding water table,
etc.) is increasing rural poverty rates across the state. A recent
government survey showed that nearly 66 percent of farming households in
Punjab are in debt. With total farmer indebtedness hovering at around
Rs. 240 million, a large-scale default could cripple Punjab’s credit
market, causing wide-scale repercussions throughout the nation. In a
developing country where even a one percent increase in GDP translates
to the economic elevation of millions of poor households, a
Punjab
debt-crisis can be ill afforded by India.
If Punjab is to continue as the food grain capital of India, modern
agricultural practices will have take into account the reality of the
water situation and create a feasible long run plan for a sustainable
future.
The Columbia Water Center/Punjab Agricultural University Partnership
To address the problem of groundwater sustainability in Punjab, the
Columbia Water Center has partnered with Punjab Agricultural University
(PAU) to promote the use of technology and science in farming.
The CWC-PAU initiative in Punjab aims to reduce the water demands of
agriculture by engaging farmers, agricultural corporations, insurance
providers, and regional agencies in a field project to adapt better
crop choices, irrigation practices, and insurance options. Over 500
farmers across 50 villages in Punjab have as a result implemented
water-saving techniques in five of the twenty districts–Amritsar,
Jalandhar, Ludhiana, Moga and Sangrur.
The farmers continue to grow
rice but utilize targeted techniques to promote water efficiency during
the process. Technologies include laser leveling of fields before
sowing and the use of tensiometer technology for effective irrigation scheduling.
As a result of these project interventions, a significant amount of
groundwater has been saved already. The estimated total amount of water
saved as a direct result of tensiometer use and direct seeding is 575
million liters–enough to meet the basic daily water consumption needs
of over 100,000 individuals. The CWC-PAU team project that this early
success will have a tenfold multiplier effect in each village, with the
idea that the success of ten farmers using tensiometers for irrigation
scheduling will motivate 100 other farmers in the village to adopt the
technology over the next year. The study aims to increase the total
number of villages included in the study next year to between 100 and
150.
In addition, to promote an understanding of the larger issues at
stake, the CWC/PAU organized various workshops and meetings to initiate
in-depth discussions with the selected farmers on water issues. The
initiative intends to reduce the impact of climate uncertainty through
changing water use patterns, diminishing resource depletion and
reducing energy use, all while maintaining yields and income. By
shifting the focus from water development to water management, the study
aims to decrease pressure on rapidly disappearing groundwater reserves
in the region by combining research and best practices in both
economics and ecology.
Further policy and project interventions include the late
transplantation of rice, direct seeding of grains, and the promotion of
diversification towards more remunerative and less water-intensive crops
such as basmati, sweet corn and baby corn—crops that have the potential
to become increasingly profitable to farmers while consuming
significantly less water than rice.
However, despite the enormous potential and profitability of
vegetables and other alternative crops, past efforts to shift sizeable
crop areas away from rice towards others has yielded little
success–largely due to the higher risks in production and marketing
associated with the cultivation of these alternative crops. Thus, an
integral part of the crop-substitution project aims to build a viable
supply chain and use crop insurance to promote crop diversification and
reduce income risk to farmers.
Significant water can also be saved by developing crop-specific
guidelines for farmers so they can readily identify whether a particular
technique is actually reducing water use and by how much. The process
of developing insurance plans to buffer the impact of changing crop
production and patterns, the increased risk of using new technology, and
the implementation of strategies to scale up interventions is also
underway. On a larger scale, the CWC is designing regional climate
change models using information on climate change patterns and local
water storage capabilities that will forecast and evaluate the potential
impacts of the business-as-usual strategy against the proposed mix of
sustainable, field-tested interventions.
Last week, a British firm listed India as second, only behind
Bangladesh, in the list of countries most at risk from the impact of
climate change. While the climate change impacts on water are uncertain
but imminent, it is clear that India, with its large population, will
face serious resource and environmental challenges in the coming
decades.
But if India can move early and decisively, it has the knowledge and
capacity to be a game-changer within the subcontinent and turn its
climate management lessons into examples for many other developing
nations facing similar problems.
Written by Shama Perveen@State of the Planet
No comments:
Post a Comment