Nomac Drilling Corp. floorman Matthew Brown, right, steadies a section
of drill pipe as floorman Richard Lane cleans the connection during
natural gas drilling operations for Chesapeake Energy Corp. in Bradford
County, Pennsylvania, U.S.
Environmental and health groups are
calling for tougher U.S. regulation of hydraulic fracturing for
natural gas, turning on a one-time donor to their causes:
Chesapeake Energy Corp. (CHK)
The Sierra Club, the largest U.S. environmental group, is
rethinking early support of natural-gas development after
activists and scientists linked the drilling to tainted water
and increased air emissions, Executive Director Michael Brune
said yesterday in an interview. The group turned down $30
million from Chesapeake after he took over in 2010, he said.
“Five years ago most environmental groups thought of gas
as a clean but flawed alternative” to coal, Brune said at a
Bloomberg Government breakfast with reporters and editors in
Washington. “The more we heard from people” with water issues
“the more we realized that there were more problems with gas
than we thought.”
The American Lung Association, which like the Sierra Club
got donations from Chesapeake, is urging the Environmental
Protection Agency to force gas drillers to cut down on methane
emissions, calling for tougher rules even as industry asks to
weaken the standards. Those EPA rules are now being reviewed by
the White House.
Taken together, the calls show that fracking is becoming
toxic for Washington-focused environmental groups, which once
backed cheap natural gas as a way to push out coal-fired power
plants and cut the carbon-dioxide emissions scientists blame for
causing climate change.
No comments:
Post a Comment