The session on Human Right to Water has led to constructive debate 
and dialogue.  More interestingly, discussion on whether the human right
 to water implies providing water for free is no longer part of the 
mainstream debate. We have moved beyond this dichotomy and are now 
focused on figuring out how to make it work, while recognizing the costs
 involved.
There were many take-away messages. We need to operationalize the 
definition of the human right to water,  develop more specific 
indicators and targets for each dimension that makes up the human right 
to water, and work to ensure that targets and indicators are relevant 
for different country contexts. Questions such as How affordable is 
affordable?, How safe is safe?, and How available is available? will 
differ between countries.And more: We  must also work to ensure that 
water supply is affordable for customers but also for service providers.
 We must focus on the sustainability of service providers in order to 
meet the human right to water over time and keep pace with changing 
settlement patterns. And we need to stress the importance of applying an
 equity lens while implementing existing policies and norms-- if applied
 fully to what is already on the books, we would move a long way towards
 the goal of human right to water.
This has been an intense week with 20,000 plus participants moving 
between hundreds of sessions that ran from morning until night. But more
 significantly, the quality of the discussions was equally intense. On 
aggregate, at least 18 hours were dedicated to each topic and this does 
not include the animated dialogues taking place outside sessions! Most, 
if not all, sessions focused on identifying solutions to minimize purely
 rhetorical arguments and posturing.
This hasn't been easy.  Planning each session has involved many, many
 months of preparation.  I remember having our first audio conference 
with  three colleagues from a bilateral agency, an association of 
private sector utilities, and a European NGO for the human right to 
water) in November or December 2010.  And while the process was not 
perfect, it was certainly very participative. We built and benefited 
from a wide virtual dialogue with contributions  from all regions in the
 world.

No comments:
Post a Comment