Friday, February 17, 2012

Climate Change Naysayers Drowning Out Scientific Research, Expert Says by Margaret Munr

 
Miss Water South Africa Kirsten Dukes poses in front of a banner during a protest by environmental activists outside the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference of the Parties meeting (COP17) in Durban


The president of one of the world's biggest scientific organizations says the research community is being outgunned by naysayers.

She said she is "scared to death" by trends that show declining public acceptance of global warming and the growing influence of science skeptics, who have plenty of resources to spread their misinformation.

"They are actually being effective," Nina Federoff, president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, said Thursday when asked about reports of a new push to undermine the teaching of global warming in U.S. schools.

Documents leaked by a Canadian group this week, said to be from the Chicago-based Heartland Institute, outline plans to discredit climate change in public schools and cast doubt on the scientific findings that emissions from burning fossil fuels threaten the planet.

The Heartland Institute, which is known for its attacks on climate science, responded to the leak with a statement saying the documents were "stolen" and that at least one was a "fake." The Canadian-based DeSmogBlog, which has long opposed climate skeptics, posted the documents online Tuesday.

Federoff said the Heartland Institute's "purported" plan to step up efforts to discredit climate science highlights the need for scientists to become better at communicating and engaging the public — one of the themes of this weekend's AAAS annual meeting in Vancouver that is expected to attract close to 8,000 delegates. There are also plenty of events designed to draw in the public.

"I am very worried," Federoff told reporters. She noted that surveys indicate the number of Americans who believe in climate change has been declining "even as the scientific consensus (on climate change) has increased."

The lack of public acceptance of climate change science "stalls what we really need to be doing," she said, referring to the widely held scientific view that greenhouse gases must be reduced to slow global warming.

The resources available for "naysaying" are much greater than the resources scientists have at their disposal to counter misinformation, said Federoff, a geneticist and veteran of the heated debates over genetically modified organisms.

No comments:

Post a Comment