Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Questions About the Safety of Fracking

 To the Editor:

As the shale gas rush has exploded over the last decade, so has the number of reports of public health and environmental problems. The New York Times and others have uncovered problems such as radioactive fracking waste, drinking water contamination, air pollution and more.

Yet the controversy surrounding fracking isn’t because of an uninformed public, despite what David Brooks suggests in “Shale Gas Revolution” (column, Nov. 4). It’s because of the shale gas industry’s reluctance to address the serious risks surrounding drilling and its relentless effort to oppose even the most minimal public health protections.

In 2005, the shale gas industry successfully persuaded Congress and the Bush administration to exempt fracking from the Safe Drinking Water Act.
In 2009, the industry aggressively fought efforts by me and other members of Congress to require that drilling companies publicly reveal what chemicals they inject into the ground. And just this year, the industry sought to narrow the Environmental Protection Agency’s study on fracking’s risks to water resources.

If shale gas drilling is as safe as the industry would like us to believe, then the drilling companies must be open and honest about the injections they are jamming into the ground and should have no problem complying with basic federal environmental laws.

MAURICE D. HINCHEY
Washington, Nov. 4, 2011
The writer, a Democrat, represents the 22nd District in New York.


To the Editor:

David Brooks celebrates the benefits of shale gas, but he neglects the critical issue of global climate. Done right, shale gas does have economic, political and environmental advantages over coal. It is also a far quicker fix than renewables.

But even if we switched all our coal-fired power plants to gas, swapping out one source of carbon dioxide for another, we would still be warming the planet at only a slightly less dangerous pace. Moreover, shale gas operations today emit substantial methane, a global warming agent vastly more potent than carbon dioxide.

If a switch to gas is to occur, it must be accompanied by full-scale development and deployment of carbon capture and storage technology for gas-fired power plants, and tough curbs on methane pollution, or we will be taking unnecessary risks with the only atmosphere we have.

ARMOND COHEN
Executive Director
Clean Air Task Force
Boston, Nov. 6, 2011 

No comments:

Post a Comment