Decisions on whether and how to use massive technical solutions known
as 'geoengineering' to mitigate or reverse climate change must involve
developing countries, a session on geoengineering governance at the
Planet Under Pressure conference agreed yesterday (28 March).
Geoengineering proposals have included reflecting sunlight away from
the Earth by spraying ocean water into clouds or loading the
stratosphere with sulphate aerosols, bioengineering crops to be paler
and more reflective of sunlight, managing solar radiation and removing
carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Although geoengineering research groups are emerging in Africa, China
and India, the controversial discipline is dominated by a small number
of organisations in North America and Europe, the meeting heard.
"It's very important that people with knowledge and understanding of
science and the climate change challenges faced by developing countries
are involved in setting the agenda for research," Jason Blackstock, a
visiting geoengineering expert at the Institute for Science, Innovation
and Society at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom, told
SciDev.Net.
This article is part of our Planet Under Pressure 2012 coverage -
which takes place 26-29 March 2012. To read insights from our conference
team please visit our blog.
The issues faced by vulnerable populations "should be front and
centre in the conversation about the technologies and the governance
structures that are going to evolve," he said.
Andy Parker, a senior policy officer at the Royal Society of London,
the UK's science academy, which issued a report on research governance
for managing solar radiation in December, said the effects of deploying
such technology "will not be localised" and that there are many
unknowns. For example, he said, scientists do not know how
geoengineering could impact rainfall patterns around the world.
And while the Royal Society's report did not make specific governance
recommendations - "it is too early" for these, Parker said - it did
highlight the need for open and inclusive dialogue.
Parker added that meetings held over the past year in China, India
and Pakistan had registered a "general and healthy scepticism" in
geoengineering, and had not regarded geoengineering as a useful or quick
technical fix.
He said these meetings had also been characterised by a "genuine
desire to cooperate" on research and governance and a wide appreciation
of open discussions on geoengineering, rather than "being told what to
think" by the developed world.
The Royal Society is now funding a geoengineering meeting in Africa,
in association with the African Academy of Sciences and TWAS, the
academy of sciences for the developing world. It is expected to be held
later this year in Ethiopia.
Kathy Jo Wetter is a researcher at the Action Group on Erosion,
Technology and Concentration (ETC), a non-governmental organisation
based in Canada which has held workshops on new technologies in
Ethiopia, South Africa and Uganda.
She told SciDev.Net: "The technology that people in our workshops
were most interested in was geoengineering, because they say, 'we never
hear about this ... we don't want our first experience of this to be
when it's there at our doorstep'."
Although there are mechanisms in place that govern how people use
technologies, Blackstock said, there are no international research
frameworks in place to assess early stage technologies and the best way
to develop them.
He suggested that the International Council for Science (ICSU) or the
Future Earth alliance may be able to develop such a framework.
Gordon McBean, a climatologist at the University of Western Ontario
and president elect of ICSU, agreed that the organisation could address
this issue, and told SciDev.Net that he was involved in discussions at
the conference to consider this.
Although governance of new technologies has not been included in the
first draft of the outcome document for the UN Conference on Sustainable
Development (Rio+20), the latest negotiating draft for the June meeting
does refer to technology assessment, said Wetter.
If that reference stays in the final draft, it may help fill the
"vacuum of technology assessment that exists within the UN system right
now", she said.
Published by All Africa
No comments:
Post a Comment