The US is
fighting a proposal, backed according to France by least 100 countries,
for transforming UNEP from a poorly noticed, second-string unit into a
planetary super-agency.
Environmentalists have long complained
that Nairobi-based UNEP, set up in 1972 as an office of the UN and with a
membership of only 58 nations, lacks clout to deal with the globe's
worsening ills.
These range from climate change, water stress and over-fishing to species loss, deforestation and ozone-layer depletion.
But
the environmental mess also coincides with the crisis of capitalism,
which greens say is blind to the cost for Nature in its relentless quest
for growth.
The fateful intertwining of these problems points to a
unique chance of a solution at the June 20-22 "Rio+20" conference, they
argue.
With possibly scores of leaders in attendance, the 20-year
follow-up to the famous Earth Summit has the declared aim of making
growth both greener and sustainable.
"The new capitalism which
emerges from the crisis has to be environmental, or it won't be new,"
French Ecology Minister Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet said on Tuesday.
The
key vehicle would be UNEP, which according to the vaguely-worded French
proposal would be changed into the World Environment Organisation.
It
would become the UN's 16th "specialised" agency alongside the World
Health Organisation (WHO), Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) and
so on.
To the outsider, this may sound at best like a bit of
terminological tinkering -- at worst, just another bureaucracy-breeding
machine.
Experts, though, say status change could be surprisingly far-reaching.
Specialized UN agencies have high degrees of autonomy, enabling them to set
agendas, frame international norms, stir up interest in dormant issues
and sometimes poke their noses into areas of national sovereignty.
At
its most ambitious, a World Environment Organisation would embrace not
just the member-states which fund it but also business, green and social
groups, becoming a very loud voice indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment