A senior UNESCO official has complained that science is being
left out of key parts of the negotiations on the draft conclusions of UN
Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) to be held later this month (20–22 June) in Brazil.
Hans d'Orville, assistant director-general for strategic
planning at UNESCO (the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organisation), told SciDev.Net that despite rising
acknowledgement of the importance of science in tackling global
problems, it was failing to make an impact on negotiations over what
will be agreed at Rio+20.
Speaking on the sidelines of a UNESCO press briefing on Rio+20
this week (30 May), he said: "Science has become much more important for
judging the state of the planet, and at the same time showing which
direction to take.
"Why the politicians are not picking up on that is a cause for concern," he told SciDev.Net, adding that it was a "constant uphill struggle to get science recognised".
The Science and Technology Major Group, one of nine official
communities inputting into the Rio+20 negotiations, also expressed
frustration that a real commitment in the draft conclusions to science
and innovation in sustainable development was fading away.
"The nexus of science, technology and sustainable development
is not currently reflected in the draft," it told national delegations at negotiations on the outcome statement that will emerge from Rio+20 this week (29 May–2 June), according to Canada's International Institute for Sustainable Development reporting services.
Gisbert Glaser, coordinator of the Major Group on science, and a senior adviser at the International Council for Science, told SciDev.Net there was a "vacuum of political commitment".
The group wants decisions made that would allow a "global
innovation system" to emerge after Rio+20 that harnesses the forces of
science, technology and engineering for sustainable development.
To this end, it wants Rio+20 to commit to large-scale,
solutions-oriented research projects; contributions from the private
sector; unprecedented levels of international scientific and
technological cooperation; and support for capacity building.
It is also seeking a global mechanism to facilitate
international scientific collaboration for sustainable development, and
an international knowledge-sharing platform on green economy innovation.
d'Orville told the UNESCO meeting that the crucial agreement
science should get out of Rio+20 was to establish an intergovernmental
body with a mandate to integrate science with policy so that it could be heard better in the future.
"If you have such a council, of course science will play a big
role. The science footprint is everywhere, it is just the challenge of putting it to policymakers precisely."
But not everyone at UNESCO is as disappointed with the negotiations in relation to science.
Han Qunli, UNESCO's director of the executive office for
natural sciences, welcomed the fact that there were many explicit
references in the latest negotiations document to the need to work more
closely with the scientific community to further research and
policymaking.
And, he said, there were notable increases in scientific content across a range of issues, such as climate change, forests and green economies.
"In general, science has not taken a back seat in Rio," he
argued. "Lots more needs to be done, but we are happy that science as a
whole has a much clearer role than before," he told SciDev.Net.
Written by Jan Piotrowski@SciDev.net
No comments:
Post a Comment