Two weeks ago, key players from water-related NGO, government,
business, and non-profit spheres converged on Marseille, France for the 6th World Water Forum.
It was a massive conference with over 20,000 people in attendance.
Throughout the week, there were daily sessions that covered a range of
topics from global groundwater governance to international water law and
water as a human right to corporate water stewardship. In addition to
the talks, there was an exhibition hall full of pavilions with
representatives from specific NGOs or government agencies (such as the Global Water Partnership and USAID) and a “Village of Solutions” where specific initiatives were highlighted, like World Resources Institute’s Aqueduct.
As the Water Policy Fellow for the UC Center for Hydrologic Modeling,
the WWF6 was a fantastic opportunity to have face-to-face conversations
with people who are driving water policy and management decisions
around the globe. Few scientists attended, which is perhaps one of the
shortcomings of the conference because these “social science”-focused
leaders were eager to link with and be informed by experts from the
natural and technical science arena. For example, our work using GRACE
satellite technology to monitor global terrestrial water storage trends
was of particular interest to people working on global water security.
This gap between the social and technical sciences has long been
criticized. Both sides are making efforts to build bridges to link the
two sides, but connecting through the WWF was definitely a missed
opportunity!
During the WWF6, I was particularly impressed by efforts to actively
share and discuss potential solutions. Yes, the theme of the forum was
“Time for Solutions”, but the fact that practical strategies for water
solutions were being discussed was very unique. The Groundwater Governance Project
was one solution that was of particular interest to me and our work at
UCCHM. The Project is led by UNESCO, FAO, IAH and the World Bank. A
“Framework for Action” document outlines specific policy and
decision-making recommendations for more sustainable groundwater
management. The Framework has been and will continue to be applied in
several World Bank projects. If adopted by key water policy
decision-makers, the framework could have a profound impact to curb
unsustainable groundwater abstraction, which is one of the major drivers
of the negative trends we see with GRACE!
In addition to the serious talks during the day, I had the opportunity to attend Participant Media’s screening of Last Call at the Oasis,
their new documentary about the global water crisis that highlights Jay
and our research with GRACE. Although it was a small turnout, the
screening was a perfect opportunity to reconnect with the folks at
Participant, to meet some of the other people featured in the film, and
to connect with new people who were interested in our work, such as Carl
Ganter from Circle of Blue, which recently had a feature on GRACE.
The previous night, I attended a reception by Coca Cola with my former
colleagues from World Resources Institute, who we will be partnering
with to provide groundwater storage trend data for their water risk
tool, Aqueduct.
As I said, the World Water Forum is teeming with key leaders from the
NGO, business, government, and media sectors. Ultimately, I believe
that we, as scientists, must use our research to inform people involved
in policy and decision-making. By communicating the importance of our
results, we can provide the best available information to those who need
it most: the people attempting to affect change in global water use and
supply. The “Time for Solutions” is now, and only by connecting the
technical and social science worlds can we balance our global water
needs and available to truly achieve global water sustainability.
No comments:
Post a Comment