The study, produced by the Gulf Oil Spill Ecotox Working Group at UC
Santa Barbara's National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis
(NCEAS), is published in the May issue of the journal Bioscience. It is titled, "A Tale of Two Spills: Novel Science and Policy Implications of an Emerging New Oil Spill Model."
"The old model assumed that oil would simply float up to the surface
and accumulate there and along the coastline," said co-author Sean
Anderson, an associate professor at California State University Channel
Islands. "That model works well for pipeline breaks and tanker ruptures,
but it is inadequate for this novel type of deep blowout."
The 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico was unlike
any oil spill science and society had encountered. The blowout occurred
at unprecedented depths and released enormous quantities of oil (an
estimated 4.9 million barrels, or 206 million gallons). Marine and
wildlife habitats suffered major damage, and, according to authors, the
damage continues to happen today, out of sight. Local and regional
economies and livelihoods suffered as well.
According to the researchers -- a renowned group of ecotoxicologists,
oceanographers, and ecologists who convened under the auspices of NCEAS
while the spill was still active -- the response to clean up and
contain the oil followed a framework that assumed the oil's behavior
would mimic the more familiar shallow-water and surface spills, despite
the fact that the dynamics, fate, and effect of deep-water oil on
ecosystems are not understood.
"As the Deepwater Horizon spill unfolded, you would hear folks saying
things like, 'We all know what happens when oil and water mix; the oil
floats.' That wasn't the whole story, and that oversimplification
initially sent us down an incorrect path full of assumptions and actions
that were not the best possible use of our time and effort," said
Anderson.
After synthesizing existing knowledge to anticipate the potential
ecotoxicological effects of the spill, and highlighting major gaps in
scientific understanding, the scientists have created the first complete
conceptual model for understanding both the Deepwater Horizon spill and
analogous disasters in the future.
This new model accounts for how deepwater oil spills unfold and where
the resulting ecological impacts accrue. It also emphasizes that the
vast majority of the oil is retained at depth -- rapidly emulsified and
dispersed due to the physics of the pressurized oil jetting from the tip
of the wellbore -- and, among other response actions, calls into
question the efficacy of dispersants.
"We have generally hailed the use of [chemical] dispersants as
helpful, but really are basing this on the fact we seemed to have kept
oil from getting to the surface," argues co-author Gary Cherr, director
of UC Davis's Bodega Marine Lab. "The truth is, much of this oil
probably was staying at depth, independent of the amount of surfactants
we dumped into the ocean. And we dumped a lot of dispersants into the
ocean -- all told, approximately one-third of the global supply."
Co-author Ron Tjeerdema, chair of the Environmental Toxicology
Department at UC Davis, concurs. "The problem is, we really must address
the downside of such compounds, particularly in light of the fact that
the upside probably was not so great as it seemed at the time," he said.
Armed with a new foundation for research and policy implications, the
NCEAS Gulf Oil Spill Ecotox Working Group is calling for further
investigation into the long-term effects of deep-water oil spills.
"We now have a sense that the bulk of the impact was probably in the
mid-water and deep ocean," said the study's lead author, Charles "Pete"
Peterson, a professor at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
who has been deeply involved in the study of the environmental effects
of the Exxon Valdez oil spill for over two decades. "Who the heck knows
what oil does to the mid-water pelagic and deep-dwelling critters? We
need an integrated collaboration between deepwater explorers, modelers,
ecotoxicologists, microbial ecologists, and so on รณ all working together
in unprecedented ways. We need a whole new type of marine ecology."
No comments:
Post a Comment