For Tim McClanahan, a zoologist studying fisheries, what happened in Kenya during the spring of 1998 was a wake-up call.
Between March and July of that year, a rare climatological double
whammy sent ocean temperatures spiking 1 to 2 degrees Celsius above the
normal range for spring and summer. An unusually intense El NiƱo weather
pattern coincided with the warm phase of another cyclical area weather
event.
This turned out to be a slow-motion disaster. Half the corals in the
region bleached and died that year. Some had a 90 percent loss. "The
bleaching and mortality event took about six months to fully unfold, but
many of the reefs have not recovered even today -- 14 years after the
event," said McClanahan, an employee of the Wildlife Conservation
Society. He has spent more than 20 years working along Kenya's
southeastern coast.
It took four years before scientists could definitively show
dramatic declines in three commonly caught species of food fish. The lag
and the devastating results got McClanahan thinking about climate
change's potential to damage the economies of communities that
traditionally rely on fish to eat and fish to sell.
He's not alone in pondering the fate of the world's fisheries in a
changing climate, and how the fortunes of fish will affect the lives and
livelihoods of more than 1.5 billion people who depend on seafood for
at least a fifth of the animal protein they consume.
"This is an area that is pretty seriously underresearched, I think,"
said Edward Allison, a senior fellow at the University of East Anglia's
School of International Development. "The rest of agriculture sometimes
forgets fisheries, and the fisheries sector has been a little slower
than others to realize the potential seriousness of climate change
impacts."
Already, there is evidence that as the ocean warms, many commercial
fish stocks are moving poleward in search of cooler waters. Rising ocean
temperatures have triggered coral bleaching events that have caused
widespread damage to the world's reefs, which serve as a habitat for
many species.
A case of 'double jeopardy' for Africa and Asia
Researchers are also concerned about the effects that shifting ocean
chemistry will have on marine ecosystems. As the world's carbon dioxide
output has risen, oceans have absorbed more and more of the
heat-trapping gas, leaving seawater 30 percent more acidic than it was
before the Industrial Revolution began.
Eventually, ocean acidification could scramble ocean ecosystems by
making it harder for sea creatures like oysters, coral and plankton to
grow the hard, chalky shells that protect them from predators.
But experts say the consequences of those changes for fisheries are
uncertain, though many believe that climate change will ultimately
separate fish species, fisheries and the human communities that depend
on them into winners and losers.
A crop of recent studies is just beginning to figure out who those winners and losers might be.
When researchers at the Malaysia-based WorldFish Center tried to
rank countries by the vulnerability of their fisheries to climate
change, Gambia topped the list -- and all but two of the top 10 nations
were African, hailing from a continent where fish accounts for half the
animal protein consumed each day and often provides significant income.
For many countries in Africa, climate change amounts to "double
jeopardy," threatening food supplied by land and sea, said Allison, who
led the WorldFish Center analysis.
Countries like Sierra Leone, Niger and the Democratic Republic of
the Congo already face "extremely alarming" levels of hunger, according
to the International Food Policy Research Institute. With climate change
expected to decrease yields of staple crops like rain-fed maize and
irrigated rice up to 20 percent by 2050, loss of fisheries catch as well
could prove devastating.
Research suggests that many countries in Southeast Asia face similar
risks. Altogether, 400 million people in Africa and Southeast Asia rely
on fish and other marine foods like seaweed to provide half their
essential protein and minerals.
Rashid Sumaila, a fisheries economist at the University of British
Columbia, said "rough estimates" at modeling the effect of climate
change on the world's fisheries suggest catches in the tropics could
decline 40 percent by 2055 due to a panoply of factors including warming
waters and ocean acidification.
Existing problems like overfishing complicate the picture, making it more difficult to project the effects of climate change.
Like losing 10M bulls every year
"If you have a fishery that is already badly managed, so stocks are
not in good shape, and you add another stressor like climate change
heating it -- well, then it just goes," said Sumaila.
Eighty-four percent of the world's fish stocks are fully exploited,
overexploited or depleted, according to the U.N. Food and Agriculture
Organization (FAO).
That overfishing takes an astounding toll on the world economy,
ecosystems and food security in areas that rely on fisheries as a cheap
and reliable source of food.
When the World Bank recently tried to tally the economic cost of
overfishing, poor management and other inefficiencies, it arrived at a
princely sum: $50 billion per year, a number that represents both the
increased cost of chasing after scarce fish and the price of maintaining
an oversupply of fishing vessels.
For the world's poor, many of whom depend on fish as a cheap,
reliable source of protein, there is another shocking number: 10 million
metric tons. That's the weight of catch lost each year due to
overfishing, according to researchers at the University of British
Columbia.
"Recently, I tried to convert that estimate to the equivalent in
mature bulls," Sumaila said. "They weigh on average 1 ton each. So we
are talking about losing 10 million extra bulls every year out of the
ocean because of overfishing. When I turned the fish into bulls, that
shocked me."
It's also enough food to save at least 20 million malnourished people -- assuming they were fed only fish, he says.
Meanwhile, the global demand for fish is rising. Production of fish
and fish products grew from 140 million metric tons in 2007 to 145
million metric tons in 2009, a historic high according to the FAO. Much
of that growth has been fueled by aquaculture, which is increasing at a
rate of almost 7 percent per year.
Sebastian Troeng, senior vice president for marine conservation at
Conservation International, says farming fish is in some ways a more
sustainable source of protein than livestock. Producing 1 kilogram of
beef (about 2.2 pounds) requires 61.1 kilograms of grain, while
producing the equivalent amount of fish protein requires just 13.5
kilograms of grain.
"You can make more with less," Troeng said.
But there are drawbacks to farmed fish that include, in some cases,
nutritional trade-offs, said Allison. Farmed fish may not contain all
the nutrients their wild cousins do. A fish that is fed grain may not
contain as many omega-3 fatty acids as do wild fish or farmed fish that
are fed fish meal or smaller fish.
Keeping a reef from 'cement and cockroaches'
In Kenya, McClanahan is hoping that improving the management of the
area's fisheries will help gird them against future climate change.
"If you get better management in place, you can buffer these
environmental impacts more than if you don't have good management," he
said. "If you have already knocked a system back to cement and
cockroaches, it doesn't take a lot to make it worse."
Where McClanahan works, along Kenya's southern coast, fishing is
small-scale -- as he calls it, "artisanal." Fishermen use sailboats and
canoes instead of motorboats. They haul their catch in using nets,
lines, spear guns and traps made from local materials. Many eat most of
what they catch and rely on more than one job to make ends meet.
Part of McClanahan's job involves working with communities to adopt
more sustainable fishing practices, like traps with small slits that
allow juvenile fish to escape -- protecting the next-generation catch.
With climate change in the back of his mind, he's also working to
identify reefs that may prove hardier than most in the face of rising
temperatures because they have adapted to a wide range of water
temperatures, or because they are located in areas fed by tidal, rather
than wind-driven, currents.
"Some reefs are pretty much doomed by climate change, in my opinion.
Others will probably struggle but get by," he said. "We talk to
communities and say, 'This area has a high potential to survive climate
change. This is a reef you might want to protect.'"
Some communities are more receptive than others. The tiny village of
Mkwiro, perched on the border of Kenya and Tanzania, is one that has
embraced conservation measures. The Kenyan government has established a
national marine reserve nearby that allows fishing within its boundaries
and has created a local tourism economy.
But there are already hints of a changing climate.
"Bleaching used to be an oddity," McClanahan said. "Now it's become a
fairly regular thing.
It's not regular every year, but it occurs
somewhere every year, more frequently than it used to. The Indian Ocean
Dipole, a cyclical warming event, used to be a 10- to 12-year cycle at
the beginning of the last century. Now it's two to four years. Winters
are less extreme."
Studies suggest that efforts to create more sustainable fisheries
and reduce existing stresses such as overfishing can only go so far in
the face of a changing climate.
Marine-protected areas, a tool embraced by governments and
conservationists, have been shown to increase the number and size of
fish and keep corals thriving. But recent research has found those
benefits can be overwhelmed by the effects of rising temperatures and
changing weather patterns.
"Nobody wants to talk about mitigating CO2 emissions," said Sumaila.
"It is easy, politically, to talk about adaptation. But ultimately, if
we don't deal with the pumping of CO2, it's going to be tough to adapt
-- even for the strong countries."
By Lauren Morello@E & E News
No comments:
Post a Comment