The session on Human Right to Water has led to constructive debate
and dialogue. More interestingly, discussion on whether the human right
to water implies providing water for free is no longer part of the
mainstream debate. We have moved beyond this dichotomy and are now
focused on figuring out how to make it work, while recognizing the costs
involved.
There were many take-away messages. We need to operationalize the
definition of the human right to water, develop more specific
indicators and targets for each dimension that makes up the human right
to water, and work to ensure that targets and indicators are relevant
for different country contexts. Questions such as How affordable is
affordable?, How safe is safe?, and How available is available? will
differ between countries.And more: We must also work to ensure that
water supply is affordable for customers but also for service providers.
We must focus on the sustainability of service providers in order to
meet the human right to water over time and keep pace with changing
settlement patterns. And we need to stress the importance of applying an
equity lens while implementing existing policies and norms-- if applied
fully to what is already on the books, we would move a long way towards
the goal of human right to water.
This has been an intense week with 20,000 plus participants moving
between hundreds of sessions that ran from morning until night. But more
significantly, the quality of the discussions was equally intense. On
aggregate, at least 18 hours were dedicated to each topic and this does
not include the animated dialogues taking place outside sessions! Most,
if not all, sessions focused on identifying solutions to minimize purely
rhetorical arguments and posturing.
This hasn't been easy. Planning each session has involved many, many
months of preparation. I remember having our first audio conference
with three colleagues from a bilateral agency, an association of
private sector utilities, and a European NGO for the human right to
water) in November or December 2010. And while the process was not
perfect, it was certainly very participative. We built and benefited
from a wide virtual dialogue with contributions from all regions in the
world.
No comments:
Post a Comment