The new NOAA aquaculture policy is a start but overall a better climate
for aquaculture investment is needed. One of the problems is that
environmental critics hold ocean systems to a much different standard
than land based food systems. Offshore aquaculture is a key component of
a future US seafood industry.
In the coming decades, the world is going to face
food-supply challenges, and aquaculture can contribute to feeding the
growing world population sustainably. So why are more advancements not
being made? John Forster of Forster Consulting in Washington, D.C.,
thinks general stagnation and regulatory smothering are suffocating
offshore aquaculture’s potential. Forster talked to SeafoodSource
recently about the problems, challenges and potential of offshore
aquaculture.
National Offshore Aquaculture Act of 2007
National Offshore Aquaculture Act of 2007
Forristall: Why is offshore aquaculture being held back?
Forster:
The case we make for it right now is that there is a big seafood
deficit and we import 80 percent of our seafood. We could produce some
of that here and save the country USD 4 billion to USD 5 billion in
imports. But Congress and politicians don’t talk in terms of less than a
USD 100 billion idea.
We need to do something bigger that
captures their imagination. It’s more than just about supplementing our
seafood supply; it’s potentially a new system of food production.
There
are so many environmental benefits, you don’t have to use fresh water
or fertilizer and you don’t have to use any more of the land; there’s
almost unlimited space. There’s big potential if we could only solve the
problems, and they’re formidable. But there is potential for a big new
sustainable industry concept that makes sense to me, but until we can
present that idea and get the message across that ocean aquaculture is
more important than topping off our seafood supply.
Many people have environmental concerns about offshore aquaculture. This article represents the industry's point of view.
No comments:
Post a Comment